Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
Moxie: we want to surface/reward the best content Also Moxie: you can distribute Moxie for 1,000 likes daily (that's a like every 86 seconds.. for 24 hours!) Moxie encourages engagement spam, NOT surfacing/rewarding the best content
7 replies
5 recasts
29 reactions

Melissa Burr šŸ“ pfp
Melissa Burr šŸ“
@burrrrrberry
Moxie is going to live and die by the users. If people want to keep selling their souls and engagement for the price of pennies, then that's what we will become. For those of us still striving for good content, we will ignore the noise and keep interacting with the protocols promoting good content. The users make the home. If they want to live in an advertising, bait engagement swamp, then that's what we will have. I still maintain the tiniest hope that good content will prevail. Though it's a war I've been losing from day 1. I hope we can rise above this šŸ«”šŸ”„
4 replies
1 recast
18 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw ā“‚ļøšŸŽ© pfp
Ryan J. Shaw ā“‚ļøšŸŽ©
@rjs
Farmers are always gonna farm and make things messy. But we shouldn't just look at the worst? Take me for example - I'm a content producer. I look at what people are interested in, what I'm interested in, and where it intersects I do my thing and some Moxie comes my way when people engage. People who own my FT then promote my work in an affiliate marketing sort of way because they know that engagement with my work will reward them back via the FT. I don't feel like I'm selling my soul or anything?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Melissa Burr šŸ“ pfp
Melissa Burr šŸ“
@burrrrrberry
Neither is Zeni and other builders. I'm clearly not talking about the people actually utilizing the protocol in the right way
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw ā“‚ļøšŸŽ© pfp
Ryan J. Shaw ā“‚ļøšŸŽ©
@rjs
Oh my bad, I misunderstood your comment then
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions