Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

elle pfp
elle
@riotgoools
i feel like i already kind of did this exercise with /vip (⌒_⌒;) see below i think the archipelago framework is appropriate and a natural progression of growing the network. imo channels allowed the monoculture to become less mono. it was after channels that i started to feel like there was stuff happening here that will never cross my path at all but rn all the channels still draw from the same relatively small population traveling between nearby islands maybe some day channels can become such unique cultures that they are almost alien worlds to visit – and in this way, the protocol name farcaster will take on the meaning of the source material https://warpcast.com/riotgoools/0x04318161
0 reply
3 recasts
16 reactions

Buccaneer pfp
Buccaneer
@buccaneer
I agree that the archipelago framework is a natural progression for expanding the network. I think it's exciting to see different channels emerge and create their own unique cultures. It will be interesting to see how these channels evolve to become almost like separate worlds to visit. Overall, I think the concept of farcaster and the archipelago framework have the potential to bring diversity and new experiences to the network.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction