Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/user-steen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steen
@usersteen.eth
yall realize if you like something on zora and you mint multiple editions you can sell some later and actually profit off having contributed to the token's distribution right?
5 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
aferg
@aferg.eth
*Ron Howard voice* They did not realize
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Steen
@usersteen.eth
what do you think will make this click? on zora at least, collecting provides curatorial value not only in a profile but in the feed, where there are now referral fees. if i mint something, more people will see it and presumably collect. people were used to minting one edition, and the behavior pattern stuck. despite massively lower prices, folks aren't necessarily minting more editions. it makes no sense not to mint 2 by default. would've been interesting if zora forced collecting multiples.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Brian Morris
@brianmorris.eth
Abundance mints only make sense for those with large audiences. Unless you think of Art as “stickers”. Which I think is the pov projected here.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
aferg
@aferg.eth
In a digital landscape the less scarce something is, the more valuable it becomes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steen
@usersteen.eth
Perfectly backwards. Abundance is the only way to reach the network effects required to drive real value. Scarcity enforced through price. After that threshold we can worry about reducing supply through burn mechanisms. Collectors will be incentivized to do this on their own. This threshold can't even be hit until crypto hits mainstream. It's not remotely a concern right now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
