The point of the subscription economy is ontological. Everything — can now be a service provided at a forever cost. Ownership is often about a transactional completion, where you acquire something and then move on, satisfied with having met your need. It’s finite, with a clear start and end. Subscription, on the other hand, is a perpetual commitment, a continuous cycle that prevents closure. It keeps you tethered, never fully satisfying the need in a permanent sense because the expectation is that you’ll always be engaged, always consuming, always involved. It’s a structure that denies the ability to “move on” because it’s built around an ongoing dependency. In this way, the subscription economy by redefining time also reshape the very nature of “self” 4 replies
1 recast
27 reactions
Acquisition is anchored in a linear, finite concept of time—acquiring something, using it, and then moving on. Time feels segmented, with clear phases: acquisition, use, and completion.
Subscription, however, collapses that linear progression into a loop, where time becomes cyclical and ongoing. You’re not moving through distinct phases but are instead perpetually engaged in a continuous experience, where the past and future are tied together by the subscription itself. The structure keeps you rooted in the present moment of consumption, with the future always anticipating more engagement, often without the resolution. It’s an endless feedback loop, where time becomes something you’re always returning to rather than ever truly leaving behind. 1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
The shift from acquisition to subscription can be seen as a reflection of the cultural stasis we’re experiencing. In a way, the subscription model encourages a kind of perpetual present, where everything is in motion but nothing ever truly changes or progresses. The sense of closure, personal growth, or reaching a meaningful conclusion becomes elusive, much like how many aspects of contemporary culture are stuck in a cycle of nostalgia, reboots, or continuous consumption.
Instead of progressing towards new, transformative ideas, we’re often recycling or consuming the same things over and over. The sense of moving on—whether it’s advancing in art, technology, or personal development—becomes harder to achieve when everything is designed to keep you engaged in a never-ending loop. It’s as if we’re trapped in the current, unable to evolve past the constant demands of our commitments, with no space for true novelty or the kind of growth that comes from letting go or moving on. 1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
