@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bradq pfp
bradq
@bradq
Huh, this is an interesting way to put this...in the betting world it's like Bryson is +280 on a single, smaller bet. Everyone's been buying big shares of this person or that person. I like seeing this. @tldr maybe this way of betting that jeff did is obvious to you, but wasn't to me.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Yes, you can choose an amount or you can target shares Which do you think Bracky should drive net new users to? In order to have a good initial experience.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

bradq pfp
bradq
@bradq
It struck me the way it's stated here is more welcoming because a small bet if fine to be part of it and it's very much like fan duel if you do the quick math and get +280. The way we/I have doing the last couple has been more like assembling a fantasy team imo. So, it's different ways to do it or present it. Not sure which is better if any. But maybe some clearer instruction and using these types of illustrations would bring wider connection or quicker understanding depending on where the person is coming from.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Yes — there are multiple ways to look at the same time. Im not a huge fan of traditional betting nomenclature unless the person is an experienced bettor. Whatever the best way is — the most powerful way to present is in the detail way Bracky will frame / suggest. Most people aren’t going to go seek out directions — we have one chance to meet them where they are imo It’s a great thing to keep an eye on!!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction