πͺ
@shl0ms
i make myself available in various places online 24/7 with basically the only stipulation being that i can block the unstable people my persona inevitably attracts cannot imagine using FC to replace Twitter without blocks, especially as DAUs flood in itβs disheartening to see them keep conflating mutes with blocks
6 replies
3 recasts
27 reactions
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
Are blocks possible with an open network like this?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
πͺ
@shl0ms
perhaps it is against the ethos but it is 100% possible for them to implement a feature that allowed me to restrict someoneβs ability to respond to my posts
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Boris Mann
@boris
This is pretty much exactly the path that Bluesky went down. The Farcaster team can learn a lot from what did / didnβt work with Blueskyβs ATProtocol. And theyβre going to need it, quickly, if they keep US phone number registration free/open.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
πͺ
@shl0ms
yep 1000% guess whoβs not using bsky ever again
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Boris Mann
@boris
Oh, not what I meant. Iβm on Bluesky and they did do it right and fixed it. If you were on before they got that implemented, it was likely rough. Which I see starting here. Bkuesky has mute / block implementations in a decentralized environment. Including blocking interactions.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
πͺ
@shl0ms
oh they got the block part right lol, i donβt use it anymore mostly because the demographics changed and also it got radically anti-crypto
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
