Data

Do OG users get more engagement?

Yes but only for the really early users according to my probably buggy analysis... newer users actually seem to be getting the most analysis, please critique. I think bots could be distorting numbers a lot, I should probably throw out users with very high avgs >> 2 or 3x std dev?

https://dune.com/queries/4069970

Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower?

If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.

Pi-chi.eth (she/her) Artist /animeoutcasts
Purple Promoter|Tokyo DAO
Hosting: /moxietools /kyoto /sakura  /anime-manga /tokyotravel

https://beacons.ai/pi_chi

Husband, dad, dev. @dune.eth wizard.

⭐ DEGEN Tips FAQ: https://paragraph.xyz/@rjs/degen-tips-ultimate-faq-v8 ⭐

Not financial advice. Not a KOL.

It's data that shows that the spam system is a problem.
I don’t know why they don’t want to fix this problem

Not sure why you feel that way? This shows that new users actually get *better* engagement per follower than older users. (Although unfortunately the auto follows will distort the data but I'm not sure how to exclude them unless somebody has a list.)