Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
One way to look at the possible effects of deepfakes in politics is to look at "shallow fakes" that have been possible for a long time. For example, this screenshot purporting to be a "you're free to say whatever nasty stuff you want" whitelist for twitter. I actually have no idea if this is real or fake, but there definitely are some people who are treating it as real, imo without sufficient evidence. And yet, the effects of things like this are pretty bounded. This feels like a plausible outcome for deepfakes in politics. The smart people know not to trust a politician's statements without confirmation on official channels, and less smart people get tricked, as they do today with shallow fakes. If something fake goes viral, Community Notes can help on the margin in making it clear that it's fake. Most normies don't actually look at this stuff in real time, and so the effect ends up not too bad. This is the strongest case for not being too worried. The place where I am *more* worried about deepfakes is...
3 replies
196 recasts
883 reactions
Alexey Bm 📈
@bm21
Great point about "shallow fakes" setting a precedent. However, I'm more concerned about deepfakes because they can be incredibly convincing and spread quickly, potentially deceiving even the most critical thinkers. As technology advances, the line between real and fake becomes harder to discern. We need robust verification tools and better public awareness to mitigate these risks.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
