Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Since FC hub data is public, what's the benefit of using SIWF over connecting with a wallet and associating a FC account (like @paragraph @bracketgame et al), and just pulling the social graph / content as needed? Especially since connecting a wallet is more decentralized than doing OAuth facilitated by Warpcast?
8 replies
5 recasts
45 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
it's one tap for siwf vs two with siwe, assuming all users have warpcast (which mine do, at least right now)
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
For your use case, it makes more sense - you’re not targeting any audiences outside of Warpcast (at least initially) What about for builders / apps targeting a broader crypto audience? Or even if they are focused on Farcaster, the optionality seems useful since FC isn’t huge yet
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

agusti πŸ˜πŸ”΅ pfp
agusti πŸ˜πŸ”΅
@bleu.eth
for builders an interseting compromise is siwn (@neynar) so you can reuse previously authorized signers by 35k userbase neynar already has this make it 1 step if they're already preauthed in any neynar signer based app
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

agusti πŸ˜πŸ”΅ pfp
agusti πŸ˜πŸ”΅
@bleu.eth
im considering using siwn over siwp or siwe/wallet
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction