Content
@
0 reply
4 recasts
4 reactions
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
i feel sad to know @farcaster is going to basically heavily handicap if not outright kill /frames with the v2 spec. Frames without post buttons are probably as useful as the original OpenGraph metadata. if we strip interactivity from the primitve, what innovation is left worth pereserving in it ?
14 replies
3 recasts
20 reactions
Deployer
@deployer
What's changing? I haven't dug in.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
basically frames are becoming single-page so no post button / action I think they're looking into improving perfornace/reduce caching. I guess v1/v2 will be supported both for a while... we'll see but big push into mini apps and frames just as discoverability tools for these imho
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Deployer
@deployer
interesting. yeah i guess mini apps are a superior experience tbh. i haven't built one yet, but assume they can do everything a frame can do plus more? whats your take?
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
mini-apps are just websites imho (recently added tx's to it, which makes it more on pair with frames capabilities so far) Imho the beauty of frames is, or was: 1. It was a new canvas enabled by its tight constraints. 2. Restraints beget simplicity, simplicity begets usability. 3. They could be inserted into *any* apps, social feeds, etc. 4. They're just interactive links! I do think there should be room for both, I don't think mini-apps should get -priority- over frames and get frames to become a second class citizen. Just my thoughts tho, maybe am biased. we'll see
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Deployer
@deployer
I actually love the current frames. Possible for really dynamic meta tags on any website.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
