Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
ππ‘ππ£π
@blankspace
ppl calling zora a memecoin launchpad are wrong imo until there is a client that emphasizes this, it's simply buying on secondary framing via ui/ux does matter and nothing about zora currently has that framing they're just tokens in different wrappers
5 replies
2 recasts
11 reactions
tomu
@tomu.eth
it adds liquidity, which was much needed. nothing else. the memecoin framing obv came from memecoins speculators that needed a new place where to play, and after 2 days they left
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
colfax
@clfx.eth
take the chart away and nothing has changed
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
six
@six
agree ZRTK was fun tho for about 8 hours https://warpcast.com/six/0x29750aa5
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
true this was "valid" exactly for 2 days
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
deebee
@deebee
IMO the ERC20 thing is largely irrelevant in most cases. What I'm still having a problem with is the inability to set your own price in ETH. That changes the nature of the platform away from creator focused towards just being a social app. 000777 formed the basis of an onchain creator economy that helped sustain artists and their work. I understand how changing the default price 0000111 serves Zora's long term ambitions, especially on movile, but by continually stripping the options away they are alienating artists. I'm suprised there hasnt been more negative public discussion about this. Love to know what the data for the last month shows
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
