Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
if someone knowledgeable was to write something long form on the lil nouns situation leading to the veto today, i would read it
4 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions

Bixbite πŸ‘½ pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
Happy to write something out to elaborate on this more but TL;DR there are additional risks that arise from Lils putting our Nouns into the fork contract. If the end goal is to sell our Nouns then it should be via a method of sale where we maintain 100% control & are not contingent on additional props passing.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Bixbite πŸ‘½ pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
Also we had a DAO call that lasted for 11hrs w/ over 20 people jumping in & out sharing their opinions on the situation. Dot was on the call for the fair majority of it …yes these risks are edge cases, but if there are safer alternatives than us forking (which there are) we should utilize those to achieve the outcome
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
ah so there’s a risk that nouns might be escrowed but not claimed bc someone could force the dao to vote against the claim prop?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions