Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
As long as I have a vote, I'll vote against props with the main objective in "onboarding" and "onboarding masses". The flywheel of this experiment only works with self sustaining momentum when we collectively stop externalizing and start leaning into what we have, and further cultivate that. for us > onboarding more I acknowledge that there is a sense of prestige and the idea of legacy to ship a prop that "will (finally) onboard masses". However I highly doubt that this is what we collectively really want. In the words of Seth Godin, we ultimately want more people who like things we like and do the things we do. And to achieve that it means to cultivate, celebrate and cherish what we have and who we have amongst us - do more of the all the things we like and the things we do. Funnier, better, nicer, weirder, ... more for us. "For us" also means "for people like us". Eventually people like us will discover us, because: People like us enjoy the same places and cherish the same things. This is Nouns.
5 replies
1 recast
15 reactions
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
Onboarding is important and we should be focusing on that.... but the definition of onboarding is different to everyone. For me personally Nouns is a network and we need builders to build on that network to proliferate to the masses, meaning utilizing our cc0 assets, forking our contracts & spreading our ethos. I went to WDMS (World Digital Mining Summit) in Las Vegas earlier this week which is a Bitcoin mining conference with a predominantly Asian audience... I wore my Noggle earrings Andrea from Nouns Breakers made me and the amount of compliments I got, and people who recognized the Noggles, was awesome to see.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
You’re right. My point is that “onboarding” should be a secondary target and considered a result of people liking … Kendamas Andrea’s earrings … And so much more
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
