Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
How do people feel about "strong L2" vs "light L2" as umbrella terms for things with unconditional security (rollups, plasma, channels) vs things with partial security (validiums, pre-confirmations...) that's still better than a multisig? See discussion: https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1747374271717138827
34 replies
11 recasts
96 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Light feels like it's worse than strong, when in reality it is a different tradeoff entirely.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
heh light was already the result of me trying to be more neutral between the two categories, as opposed to the natural "strong" vs "weak" You have any other options in mind? What name would make you feel like working on a light L2 is an honorable thing to do?
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

mark pfp
mark
@bissell
Strong alternatives: - Maximal - Complete - Absolute Light alternatives: - Agile - Streamlined - {the 💨 emoji}
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mark pfp
mark
@bissell
(Counterarguments: - Maximal calls to mind “maximalist” - Agile is already an annoying software term - Streamlined is a clunky word, sort of trying too hard)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction