Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

binji 🔴 pfp
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
a timeless @kelvin classic https://kelvinfichter.com/pages/thoughts/hybrid-rollups/
3 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
I actually have an idea on how to do a hybrid zk/op roll up. It uses the underlying principle of this post I wrote: https://ethresear.ch/t/lookup-singularity-via-mmr/18704 …
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Ignore the MMR part. So we’re just precomputing a lookup table and use it as a public input into the circuit. We have a ZKP + a list of assumptions. If the ZKP is incorrect, something in the table must be wrong. Submitting a fraud proof a table entry is a lot simpler than bisecting the execution trace.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

binji 🔴 pfp
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
tagging in people who can speak euler in case interested @tynes @kelvin @proto
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Thanks! Ive thought this through. Even the MMR approach with an EigenLayer AVS would be more simple than the current approach. You just tune the amount staked to adjust security level.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction