Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Revenue will almost certainly make you more money than VC funding will ever will, unless youāre Ryan breslow. If you have a long term perspective then these two are often at odds, go with revenue and youāll learn far more
20 replies
11 recasts
39 reactions
Abubakarš©
@bigbenz
Even though you might be right, how do you convince a project to ignore a readily available huge VC funding to an uncertain generated revenue ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
š¤·āāļø same way you walk by a donut shop and donāt rush in and binge yourself to death. Discipline and self control are very undervalued, especially by VCs š
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Abubakarš©
@bigbenz
Wise one there šÆ Although the generated revenue might be more sustainable, why are you against VC funding? VC fundings have assisted some projects in reaching the top you know ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
I think theyāve mostly assisted middle managers and mediocre products to fly above their pay grade. The world has enough mediocrity in it already
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Abubakarš©
@bigbenz
Whatās your proposed solution to this though ? Setting up agencies that scrutinize the long term potentials of projects and also measure the extent and quality of value addition ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Hahah no, I propose no solutions to this other than ādonāt take money that will bite you in the assā I donāt think an agency or monitoring is required for how people choose to build things, Iād rather keep VC as is than move to a system designed to measure if startup should be bootstrapped vs Vc backed. I think if the future winds up there weāve taken some wrong turns
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
