Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/antimeme
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

šŸ—æ pfp
šŸ—æ
@bias
what if communism is inevitable on a long enough timeline, itā€™s just the flavor of the inevitable communism that changes depending on the initial inputs start out communist, itā€™s a very strong and oppressive flavor: always(?) start out capitalist and maybe the communism flavor that arrives is some kind of weird amalgamation (fully automated luxury communism or some other strange flavor, maga communism(?))
6 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

shoni.eth pfp
shoni.eth
@alexpaden
i see youā€™re describing communism quietly supplanting capitalism. historically, ā€˜infiltrate and pivotā€™ tactics rely on manipulationā€”Zersetzung and Hypernormalizationā€”keeping people disoriented and undermining trust. recent revelations about USAID funding media outlets and the DoD contracting with news services echo these methods. Once people sense self-serving agendas, faith in institutions collapses. If communism (or any new system) truly works, it should prove itself transparently, not by subverting existing structures. coerced or deceptive adoption erodes social trust; show real benefits, and people will embrace it willingly. & if it comes down to trying some covert ā€˜infiltrate and pivotā€™ plan against the U.S.? we donā€™t negotiate with terrorists or turn a blind eye to hostile takeovers. America will crush any such attempt outright. prove your system legitimately, or donā€™t botherā€”because forced ā€˜revolutionsā€™ wonā€™t fly here. https://warpcast.com/alexpaden/0xed4ca655
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

PurpšŸ‡µšŸ‡ø pfp
PurpšŸ‡µšŸ‡ø
@purp
Also maga communists are a fed larp, I'd be very careful on that road I don't trust Jackson Hinkledinkle as far as I could spit
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ܙܟÜŖܝܐā€™sšŸ§  pfp
ܙܟÜŖܝܐā€™sšŸ§ 
@zef
how does one define communism?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I was attending a seminar on AI and future trends yesterday. The keynote speaker (from the US) emphasized the growing divide between asset owners and labor providers So pretty much what Marx wrote three volumes about some 140 years ago, during the previous Industrial Revolution Time is a flat circle, nihil novi sub sole, etc
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions

PurpšŸ‡µšŸ‡ø pfp
PurpšŸ‡µšŸ‡ø
@purp
Also in terms of second scenario start capitalism end up socialism that's the backbone of lenninism and trotskyism
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

PurpšŸ‡µšŸ‡ø pfp
PurpšŸ‡µšŸ‡ø
@purp
Yes lmfao The biggest critique of capitalism by marx wasn't that capitalism is bad it's that it's long term success is unobtainable by the inherent contradictions that exist in it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction