Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
💟❓❓❓ If you were joining another app on the Farcaster network/protocol, would you expect your followers from this app to automatically be there? Would you prefer: 1. Followers are same across all apps on FC protocol 2. Manually decide when joining new app 3. Different followers on different apps 4. Smth
22 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur.eth
I like the option in 2. If the content is similar enough then same follows should work. I'm excited for some client(s) to support lists, so maybe there's a standard feed/list that is Farcaster-wide and one that could be curated for that specific client.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Ok, follow up question. So let’s say you have followers on this 💟 app. And then you join the ☯️ app and manually bring your followers Later… When you add a new follower on 💟 or ☯️ would you expect to have to “resync” the two apps?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯
@mc10
Now, can you reframe the question from the follower perspective as well?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
following vs. followers If a user "follows" me w/ a client, that means they are mapping to my FID (lives on Ethereum). Any time I cast a message from any client, if the cast is sent to the Farcaster protocol, it's available to any other client. So by definition, your audience is available from any client.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur.eth
Probably, yes. That would be ideal, I think.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
