Jason Goldberg βοΈ π
@betashop.eth
there's no need to "tip" your π and π¬ and π take care of it for you
93 replies
236 recasts
815 reactions
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
Protocol-based rewards are great - but a π©/π function gives agency to humans, allowing us to reward content which we find subjectively good. Why not
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Jason Goldberg βοΈ π
@betashop.eth
Someone can build
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
So interesting that these seem to be default responses to user feedback in the FC ecosystem: 1. You don't need that thing that you are asking for 2. Build it yourself Imagine if this was the default answer from ALL innovators in all fields when they received feedback on early iterations of their products/services.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg βοΈ π
@betashop.eth
Thatβs not the point. Our team has built a ton of stuff and anyone is free to extend it! Itβs the beauty of permissionless development!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
I appreciate the "permissionless development" aspect and protocols-over-centralized networks. But to my mind, if a token is going to gain wide adoption, it should be usable for the range of natural transactions. There's a reason the EU standardized to the Euro - it's better NOT to be carrying around a bunch of different currencies that can only be used in a few cases - rather than need $DEGEN, Warps, $farther, and $Moxie to do all the things we do here, wouldn't it be great to have a single token to use for all transactions?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kristin Piljay γ
@kristinpiljay
I like what you built and I don't see the need to tip moxie, as we already have degen, farther, masks, ham, wild, rare and god knows what else already. We also have words and actions to communicate what we like and could use some other tipping mechanism in addition to it, if we so choose.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
