Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Tolman
@bentolman
No one talks about /ethics . When they talk about out good vs. bad they usually mean for their own interest. The complexities of the Israel/Palestine conflict are greatly reduced if you just look through the lens of ethics for example.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
Please expand on that. Pretty sure any side in any conflict would also claim to be the "ethical" one. Maybe the ethics are already "priced in"?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Tolman
@bentolman
They would claim to be ethical without actually doing the mental work needed to see if their claim is accurate. There is a way to check if you are being ethical or if others are, anyone can claim anything they like.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
Hard for me to imagine it is that simple. Wouldn't different people have different value hierarchies? How do you determine which of the value hierarchies is superior?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Tolman
@bentolman
Here’s what chat gpt has to say about it, seems simple. Addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ethically involves recognizing the rights and dignity of both parties, promoting justice, and fostering a two-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians can coexist peacefully with secure borders and equal rights.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
Right. Now we just need both sides to agree to that and another conflict is solved.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
