Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben DiFrancesco
@bendi
What DAOs can *not* do: solve problems inherent in human organizations, like bureaucracy, politics, etc... What DAOs *can* do: enable new kinds cross-jurisdictional, internet native organizations of shapes, sizes and scales not feasible before. The first thing is impossible. The second thing is a big deal nonetheless
6 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions
TheThriller 🎩 Adam Miller
@thethriller
Why can DAOs necessarily not solve those key problems? They introduce new coordination mechanisms that can be layered and combined with all the old ones. Surely that can be used to help solve more of whatever social problems have ailed us to date.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Rolf Hoefer
@rolfhoefer
DAOs that have no humans in them are not really the type of organizations most people think about when hearing DAOs I think.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
f0xapocalypse 🦊
@f0xapocalypse.eth
I don't think we're late enough into the game to make definitive claims about what a DAO can or can’t do and putting limits on things. Will they change human nature? Probably not. But could they work *with* human nature to change human behavior? Seems much more achievable!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
s3unha
@ho
will the first set of probs be solved when participants are less or not human?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ManuAlzuru🥑
@manu
DAOs just by being DAOs don’t solve the human organizational problems that’s for sure. However, if the processes are really well defined they might serve us as a tool for coordination within DAOs.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jacknefty.eth
@nefty
wat if they can do both. and to date, it’s been a design problem. bitcoin isn’t a dao per se, but solved the first.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
