Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I wrote a bit about Farcasters consensus model, and the specific tradeoffs we had to navigate. Planning on sharing more broadly tomorrow, any feedback is appreciated! https://www.varunsrinivasan.com/2024/04/28/the-goldilocks-consensus-problem
25 replies
35 recasts
220 reactions
behkod.base.eth
@behkod.eth
I'd appreciate it if you could elaborate more on this "edit"ablity of casts (either providing links to discussions, docs, whatever). An article on "Thinking MEV on FC/Deltagraphs" would also be really interesting to start a series of thoughts [If someday this design pattern is used for games, MPs as you said)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
if you want to build "edit", you can do it just by deleting and recreating the cast, though this will lose all relations to others objects (likes, follows etc)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
behkod.base.eth
@behkod.eth
I see. So you mean in this design, its not possible to implement the edit at all (now or in the future)? Is it like double spending?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
If you want to implement edit and allow all the old likes and comments to remain, it's technically possible but just confusing ux. What if I post "I love dogs", you say "me too" and I edit it to "I hate dogs" later?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
