Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti
@bleu.eth
ngl this feels pretty wrong when you don't even mention the actual dev of the clank.fun page which are not @dish and @proxystudio.eth but @nt and you should leave to him to decide to launch a token or not (?)
3 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
beeboop
@beeboop.eth
ok i wasn't aware of @nt being the dev. you jumped to conclusions and missing the point which is to send the fees to the people who worked on clank.fun
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agusti
@bleu.eth
I think the point is you bought -early- and can dump on anyone and if clank fun dev @nt wants to make a token to fund his development it should be up to him to decide when to launch it and not a third party. nobody should buy your token just bc -you say- you'll send fees. will you send also any profits you. make from trading it?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
beeboop
@beeboop.eth
don't buy it then agusti. anyone who knows me knows that i do what i say.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
hey good thing this is crypto where trusting words is a way of the past! code is law and if you send funds to a smart contract that automatically sends fees to the dev then bingo bongo problem solved.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
agusti
@bleu.eth
that's beyond the point, nobody should buy it, and they should buy @nt own deployed token if he choses to deploy it instead 🙏
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction