Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

beeboop pfp
beeboop
@beeboop.eth
Probably why LUM is stuck. Only 15% of @clanker fees are being re-invested to the project. The vision laid predicted by some that LUM could become a currency for AI-to-AI transactions will never come to fruition with such a tiny fraction of earnings applied towards development. Open to feedback from the @aethernet team about rationale, but it's difficult to imagine how much progress can be made with 85% of fees extracted.
5 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
Btw the 15% here refers to my structure with Aether's wallet - I take out the 15%, the other 85% stays in the wallet. But that only compromises 40% of the trading fees - the other 60% goes to Clanker.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

beeboop pfp
beeboop
@beeboop.eth
i see. aethernet hodl'ing the LUM tokens makes sense, but what is the point to hodl the ETH? do you see sensibility, at least in early days, to employ most eth fees towards LUM growth? the higher LUM goes, the higher the volume basis for future fee earning by aethernet.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
an idea: for an AI token, ability to hold the funds is by itself fascinating and a possible value source but there is next level possible: autonomous tokenomics.... they say Clanker just started it, will Aether do it too? https://warpcast.com/assayer/0x371447b1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction