Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
26 reactions
Roberto Bayardo 🎩
@bayardo.eth
1/ Last week I wrote I was pretty confident we could double Base's execution throughput without any issue, but also noted we wanted to more than "pretty confident" before making any moves. Well now are!
9 replies
15 recasts
75 reactions
Roberto Bayardo 🎩
@bayardo.eth
2/ We performed chain benchmarking on typical hardware used by current node operators, simulating the effect of increasing the throughput of our sequencer by up to triple the current target.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Squirtle0x
@squirtle0x.eth
I'm interested in the interplay between low gas fees and the increase in spam transactions. As fees decrease, spam transactions rise, consuming more blockchain space. This complicates the goal to keep fees below 1 cent. Will it always be an uphill battle? Or is there an aspect i'm missing where bots don't spam?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
GrandMasterSifu
@grandmastersifu
That’s what TF we wanna here! GG
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bigdegenenergyⓂ️🎩🍖 ↑
@bigdegenenergy.eth
This is why Base is the best! Nice work!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nelson
@nelsonmckey
Excellent stuff. Methodical, but moving quickly.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
$BASED 🔵
@basedcoin
Flip the limit parameter 10x and just push it to production, based gods told me it’s fine
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
D (Keeper of Cr00d) 🍖🦖🎩
@xdtox
Just so noone ever forgets what real hell was like... I present to you two screenshots of back to back transactions in 2021 that I now call...#WhatThe and #F'ck So thank ya Baby Jesus for the badass teams ripping it up to make BASE amazing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
D (Keeper of Cr00d) 🍖🦖🎩
@xdtox
Yasssssss
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas Walsh
@thomaswalsh
Awesome to hear 🔥
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
