Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Looking for feedback on this iteration for channels The single biggest remaining complaint is people feeling like the pre-existing, large, topic based channels like /food or /founders should be more accesible. It will also reduce work for channel mods who don't want to have to approve every single person who wants to cast in their channel, but are OK giving up some control of who (and they can always invite someone to be a member to guarantee it). Curious: 1. Would you turn this on or off for your channel? 2. Any concerns? https://warpcast.notion.site/Public-mode-11f6a6c0c10180869699c725fa9e02e3
45 replies
211 recasts
937 reactions
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
what if we'd use openrank or smth like that to give permissions for moderating those channels can be complex but also make it weight based, similar to moxie, if 2-3 of the high ranking people want to block/hide spammer then he gets hidden
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Not following
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
moxie gives you more tokens if person with bigger rank interacts with you instead of getting moxie token we could execute community actions within channels if certain score is reached so in one case you get 300 moxie for casting in another you get person kicked out from membership for example for spam (if that person receives more than 300 spam score which adds up based on the rank of people who report) this way no need to assign or manage moderators, maybe that can work for certain communities
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What if people don’t report?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
Spam would take over 😅
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
But I think reflex is that you report spam / hide it when you see it And if we have hundreds of people being able to moderate the channel vs 1 or a few, things can work better
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
