Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Benjamin Basche
@basche42
The left and even progressives should unequivocally sympathize with this argument https://x.com/neerajka/status/1833530974212387228?s=46
2 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
Pretty much, the privacy argument is very robust. Not a lot of people care about it. I always thought that in a balanced and fair society, people should have privacy related to their capacity to abuse power. Meaning if you are a nobody you should have the right to be completely private if you're a billionaire(you shouldn't exist) but in the meantime, you should have no privacy. At some point in a balanced society, people would trade privacy for power meaning you want more power, people need to know what you're up to. Do you want more privacy? Then you have less control over aspects that other people depend on a pretty simple system. But the reality is we're moving towards a system that is inverse the more power you have, the more privacy you have, and also the more downtrodden you are, the less privacy you get.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
$degen ¢ummunist
@degencummunist.eth
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 27 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
