Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Welcome to @balajis.eth! He’s kindly agreed to do an AMA. Reply with your questions. :)
145 replies
64 recasts
301 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It feels like some of the momentum of the "let's explore alternatives to SF" movement has weakened since 2021, with AI and "back to the office" mandates contributing to re-centralization. What are your updated thoughts on how we can cleave apart that network effect to create more practical freedom of location?
1 reply
9 recasts
119 reactions

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
Quick answer: I think we’re still on track for at least three poles of technology (what I called NYT, CCP, BTC) plus a decentralized center that combines them. Why? Because (a) crypto has globally decentralized and that has accelerated since 2021 + (b) AI executive order incentivizes decentralization + (more)
4 replies
3 recasts
21 reactions

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
and (c) I think more shoes are yet to drop in terms of US regs/economy. For example: ban on self driving cars in SF/CA shows that they will push more tech back into the garage. We wil see whether a small group of tech guys in the bluest city will be allowed to make billions by disrupting many blue jobs with AI…
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Gray = "the decentralized center" 🔲 a locus without a location 🔲 a neither black nor white 🔲 a neither red nor blue 🔲 a center without the sentry 🔲 the biggest tent
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
cc @qw
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
Would you please elaborate on B? Many are arguing the EO is anti-decentralization since it will have high compliance costs.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction