Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Mini-thread: against the "One Commandment" Balaji's The Network State (see my review https://vitalik.ca/general/2022/07/13/networkstates.html ) has a concept called "the one commandment": a new startup society should have one key moral value that differs from the outside world. I argue that this is wrong.
23 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
balajis
@balajis.eth
Good thread. TLDR: one commandment is an oversimplification, but a useful oversimplification. One way to think about it: when you pitch your community to a new recruit, how do you describe it? Culdesac: car-free Kift: van life Praxis: vitalist Note what this is *not*. It's not an economic pitch. It's a values pitch.
4 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
balajis
@balajis.eth
The first failure mode is just doing a vanilla tech company. This presumes a values neutrality that no longer exists. The second is to do a tech community, but without articulating what values you stand for — or to do a DAO that's just pure economics ("wen airdrop"). The one commandment pushes back on both of these
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
balajis
@balajis.eth
Your thread is good, but I think of it as addressing the third order failure mode, which is doing a tech community and then focusing TOO much on a very explicit, non-economic core value. But the problem with today's startup societies is not an excess of focus on non-economic community values. It's the opposite.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
balajis
@balajis.eth
To elaborate a little, why is doing a vanilla tech company non-ideal in 2023? Because we don't live in the states of 2003, we live in the networks of 2023. You aren't interacting with your geographical neighbors, but with your network neighbors. Ah, but WHO are your network neighbors? That's where values come in.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction