Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

christin pfp
christin
@christin
some thoughts and questions given recent news re: "interesting content," changes to how channels work to me, social platforms are marketplaces with "buyers" and "sellers" (in this case, of content) - creators are "sellers" of their content goods - enjoyoors / vibing / curators are "buyers" as a content creator type on fc, i have expressed my concerns that the current fc algorithms punish new users too hard, which reduces possible audience sizes and makes the place not attractive to content creator types (and not fun for content consumers either!) (i also want to emphasize that i myself am a "buyer" on other platforms like instagram, youtube, etc.! there is no value judgement to be either and we often play both roles.) so what if instead, *user intent* is composable? similar to how in role-playing games, you can play as characters with diff types of specialization and it's set "per session," since sometimes I want to broadcast and share my content, and other times, support my friends with theirs
24 replies
21 recasts
168 reactions

ErenšŸŽ© pfp
ErenšŸŽ©
@baeshy.eth
a very suitable contain environment should be encouraged, a fren i onboarded about 2 weeks ago keeps tellling me how dead it is telling me they only see casts from 2 days ago and 12 hrs ago and im on my feed wondering how that is true. content creators needs larger audience to meet mmore target consumers you cant expect increase in the quality of the content when the creators arent reaching their target audience all bc of algo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

christin pfp
christin
@christin
šŸ„² yeah the delays between casting and being shown on someoneā€™s home feed makes it quite tough to share time-sensitive contentā€¦ itā€™s why I use /recaster for the reverse chronological feed when I am trying to reply-guy my friends and catch up!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions