Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Some chatter on this, especially around the “eat their lunch” phrasing My perspective as a user: Warpcast has a difficult role to play: as the largest product on the Farcaster protocol, their actions will drive the majority of new user growth Along the way, there will be other apps that emerge to fill gaps in the Warpcast value prop. Scheduled casts, onchain actions, real time chat, etc As those features are validated by users, the Warpcast team is then faced with a choice: integrate these features into the main app (thereby stimulating growth), or intentionally avoid building it to reduce competition with ecosystem partners The rub: if Farcaster doesn’t significantly grow, then all ecosystem apps will likely die anyway due to lack of sufficient users. My personal framework around this topic is less vibes driven and more realpolitik; as an app builder, you have to be prepared for your great feature idea to be copied as soon as it’s proven to be successful with users.
7 replies
26 recasts
219 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
this reads as if there’s a binary option A or B, but that’s a fallacy. there’s at least an option C, which is how most crypto ecosystems work — which is together. if we’re going to encourage competition, then at least allow other apps to actually compete by enabling sign in with farcaster (instead of warpcast) and opening read/write direct cast APIs. otherwise it’s just a platform and not a protocol.
2 replies
2 recasts
27 reactions

PsEuDO pfp
PsEuDO
@backlight
Thanks for sharing your perspective on the options available in the crypto ecosystem. It's always interesting to consider alternative approaches to competition and collaboration.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction