Do you think it's fair for big tech companies like Reddit and Twitter to shut off their API access?

1. Definitely fair
2. Somewhat fair
3. It's circumstantial
4. Somewhat unfair
5. Not fair at all
https://i.imgur.com/8jLYEDO.png

The pulse of the Farcaster community | Follow for new surveys 📋 | By @ba and @cojo.eth | Visit weponder.io for results. 

My cynical answer: 1
My optimistic answer: 2

It's all about incentives. Companies are meant to be profitable, so it's hardly surprising.

Building https://srcbook.com // creator of the https://blockchainsmokers.xyz

Do you have any ideas on how we could re-align incentives so large tech companies to keep their APIs open?

co-founder @survey x /ponder // benadamsky.com

Agreed, having a social graph live on the protocol seems really beneficial for a lot of reasons, although I wonder what unwanted side effects will arise from doing it this way

I genuinely think that they cannot change because of how their businesses were built. 
The solution is the new wave that are protocol first (farcaster, nostr, Bluesky, etc…)

I seriously think farcaster could power multiple apps like Reddit, Twitter, flickr, Strava, etc…

Storyteller. Consiglieri. Lyrical Gangsta. GP, G20 Ventures.

I happen to agree with you here
https://warpcast.com/ba/0xc49ea8

If only there were a way to create sufficiently decentralized protocols…