Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Update on channels 1. It's not a top priority right now 2. Channels are not expiring; if we end up moving forward with an expiration, we will give advanced notice; consider it an indefinite grace period 3. When it becomes a priority, we will resolve abandoned and squatted channels as part of the expiration; we will likely decentralize channel creation at that point — however, only when a top priority 4. What's higher priority than channels? a. Continue to improve frames UX, especially with regard to onchain interactions b. Improve discovery across Farcaster for anyone building / creating something onchain c. Snapchain — need to scale the underlying protocol d. Cheaper sign ups — top request from several existing apps with large user bases considering integrating with Farcaster e. Migrating Sign in with Farcaster to Farcaster Connect (see FIP) to allow other clients to provide auth for apps / frames f. Rewards and onboarding improvements around invites
22 replies
26 recasts
191 reactions

Ayush Garg pfp
Ayush Garg
@axg
if channels go away, a) how do you curate casts that are specifically targeted at one aligned community b) where would you put an effort to build a community, if not for a channel, and more importantly, why would you put an effort again c) how do you make announcements about your product, memecoin, et al d) how do you figure out if a "concept" is catching up without having a dedicated channel e) why would you kill a feature that is meant to deliver deep engagement within an existing community
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction