0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
2 recasts
24 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Like the prisoners in Plato's cave, we are stuck in our own skulls while animated shadows dance on our retinas; we should never be so gullible nor principled to accept nor reject anything at face value.
There are plenty of unresolved questions that lurk at this blurry edge of natural science and metaphysics, such as the nature of consciousness, the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, the anthropic principle, the simulation argument, the directionality of time, the relationship between mathematics and what they describe, the existence of free will, the role of the observer in quantum experiments, the fabric of reality beyond our four dimensions, the computational universe hypothesis, the afterlife, the incompleteness of objective truths, the limits to knowledge, etc. 15/17 1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
I view these as the modern equivalents to the Atlantis, Baghdad Battery, Bermuda Triangle, Big Foot, Fountain of Youth, and Loch Ness monster mysteries of yore.
Like Charles Fort before us, we must inquisitively probe the jagged edges of our perceived reality.
And that may just require that we invert and shift our normative perspectives, using first principles, lateral thinking, constraints relaxation, analogies, paradoxes, assumption reversal, meta thinking, etc. 16/17 1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions