Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Netflix but for LLMs. I pay $20/month, access whatever LLMs I want at any given time (Chat GPT, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity, etc) through a unified prompt interface, and each one receives a share of my $20 prorated to how much I used them. This allows for more dynamic competition and rewards innovative releases more fluidly than the current standalone subscription model. Who’s building this?
8 replies
1 recast
53 reactions
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
if this will drive llm quality the same way netflix drives movie quality then please no
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I’d say the trouble started when catalog owners pulled *out* of Netflix-the-aggregator, forcing it to pivot to a Netflix-the-producer business model to keep offering enough content to survive. It wasn’t Netflix’s core competency to be producing content, and that directly translates into the quality issues you’re referring to I don’t expect nor want that LLM aggregator to start training their own model, just to make the best models available at a flat rate
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
it's an adversarial environment. netflix would be stupid to not produce their own content. i don't believe there's an equilibrium where "everyone wins". but, it'll probably be a good business for a short while.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
