Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I didn’t write this, but it’s increasingly my view as well. Which means that I’m now more into Ethereum for the tech than I ever was (except at ICO, where I got in because I thought the tech was cool).
12 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Bart
@bartolomev-my-tx
That's if you assume BTC security will be fine over a 10-20 years period. I don't.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Unless they add tail issuance, which I expect they will.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
Do you mean by tail issuance that they implement more mining rewards after the 21 mil? Because if yes, I'd love to discuss this... feels like there is no place (other than here, perhaps?) where you can really discuss this..
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bart
@bartolomev-my-tx
I'm most confident a group of BTCer will want to but there's no way it will be non-contentious. Even a fork to change to post-quantum crypto will be contentious (timing of when really needed) How the fork to add issuance will play out is yet to see... I doubt the "more than 21M BTC" side will win.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
