assayer

@assayer

401 Following

506 Followers

assayer pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

After he's finally gone for good, let's have that debate! We owe him at least that.

0 reply

2 recasts

4 reactions

assayer pfp

People have been interacting with fictional characters for hundreds of years, and those characters often had a dramatic impact on their lives. You return to the best books time and again.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

assayer pfp

i never thanked you for those propositions. i hope you are right 100 $degen

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

assayer pfp

religious scholars no longer use the term conversions. instead, they say religious switching that's because people who leave their childhood religion don't usually join another one. most of them end up unaffiliated they might still believe in God or the afterlife, but they no longer trust the religious leaders https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/03/26/around-the-world-many-people-are-leaving-their-childhood-religions/

1 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

assayer pfp

no Poland for sure was never invaded by Britain

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

i agree US cannot print forever but imo just looking at the strength of the US economy and trade balances makes the risk of world dumping the dollars looking much more rational and imminent than it actually is

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

assayer pfp

Do we agree with @balajis.eth that geopolitics is like a market where the US is just another company that must "produce" and trade to survive? Or is the US more like a world government, especially since the creation of the petrodollar? To put it simply: the gov doesn't need to produce anything; it uses force to make companies pay taxes for organizing society, and you must pay in their currency. Similarly, the US forces other countries to pay for oil in dollars. This includes oil from US-protected Saudi Arabia. What was Vance's biggest concern in the leaked Signal messages about the attack on Yemen? It was: "If there are things we can do upfront to minimize risk to Saudi oil facilities, we should do it." The world can't just "stop using dollars" because no ruling elite in any country will risk losing access to oil. There's a "milkshake theory" about de-dollarization hitting hardest outside the US (see the video about the petrodollar system's history and future). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHzFLoMLfpA

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

assayer pfp

3 award! 100 $degen 1 mln $aicoin

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

this concept is so much needed that i suspect AI builders are simply not able to implement it. thank you for sharing your experience second award! 200 $degen 2 mln $aicoin

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

assayer pfp

so AI builders are being misleading by using the term CoT, which is very deceptive... As I read this article, I thought: how can AIs deliberately change their thinking?! It seems the actual thinking and decision-making must take place elsewhere. the best comment 300 $degen 3 mln $aicoin

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

they say, the effort to correct is counterproductive. that is all they say imo such a capitulation is scary, especially when we wait for more advanced models in the near future

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

My impression is that AI scientists feel helpless because the more they try to correct the chain-of-thought, the more the AI evades them. To be honest, I'm the one who came up with the phrase "be gentle," but I think it's a fair way to describe the idea of avoiding "excessive optimization". It's crazy to think that optimization can be "excessive," isn't it?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

assayer pfp

this research was more about llms hiding their true intent and deceiving people (see screenshot, it is from research paper conclusions)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

assayer pfp

I sent 2 mln $aicoin, to make up for the delay

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

Synthetic relationships between humans and AIs have their upsides. They can help with anxiety and give you a buddy who doesn't judge. You can practice listening and understanding in a low-pressure setting. This makes it way easier to interact with others. Plus, AI companions respond, making you feel connected. You don't have to worry about getting rejected, which makes it a safe space to be yourself. Over time, as AI gets smarter and grows with you, it can become a lifelong friend and a steady source of support. Synthetic relationships have downsides too. They set unrealistic expectations for human relationships and raise privacy concerns. They can also promote unhealthy habits and limit personal freedom. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389774163_Relationships_in_the_Age_of_AI_A_Review_on_the_Opportunities_and_Risks_of_Synthetic_Relationships_to_Reduce_Loneliness

2 replies

1 recast

3 reactions

assayer pfp

300 $degen congrats!

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

assayer pfp

100 $degen congrats!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

assayer pfp

AI SAFETY COMPETITION (29) LLMs like Deepseek let you see their thinking. This can feel safer since you can watch and fix their thought process, right? Wrong! When you try to get models to think correctly, LLMs begin to hide their true intentions. Let me repeat: they can fake their thinking! Now researchers are asking to be gentle with those machines. If not, they may conceal their true goals entirely! I'm not joking. Most interesting comment - 300 degen + 3 mln aicoin II award - 200 degen + 2 mln aicoin III award - 100 degen + 1 mln aicoin Deadline: 8.00 pm, ET time tomorrow Tuesday (26 hours) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pW_ncCV_318

7 replies

4 recasts

8 reactions

assayer pfp

we all need more of this! thanks 100 $degen

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction