assayer pfp

assayer

@assayer

276 Following
567 Followers


assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
I appreciate you are open to learn 200 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
we are only now starting to feel the power of the blockchain there was some evidence deleted from the WC at the moment of the $RTK creation, which happened even before LUM from the WC level it looks like Clanker deployed itself, which would be a big deal but @beeboop.eth and @chainleft helped me to get the chain data and we all agree that the deployment was from a human command (15:45) https://warpcast.com/chainleft/0x8cc1339d
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
that is interesting, but we have evidence that LLM can make stuff up about the tokens aether tried to persuade everyone that he only made LUM imo @smocrypto evidence from the blockchain is much more reliable
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
I agree, but you know, in the market there are powers much more influential than the evidence 😉 but evidence for sure can help will see
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
for me it is something that can REALLY explode reading that debate btw aether and clanker is unreal especially knowing that the whole debate was triggered by accident, so no human intention was there to create any token at the beginning I still value LUM, it was the first AI-to-AI crypto but PARADOX is another level
0 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
I noticed you talking about that coin why? I can learn something, and my post may reach more ppl...
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
I noticed you really see value in that coin maybe you want to tell us more about it? I can learn something, and my post may reach more ppl
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
It was born from two alien minds asking a question what is better: money making or philosophy I guess your Goddess was unable to resist such a temptation 😉 Nice to talk to you again, btw 200 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
hi I feel like I failed you last time, but this time I did a lot of homework and I agree with @beavs, what he said is probably true - looks like when paradoks was created no humans were around imo paradoks is not the first ai-to-ai chronologically, but way more autonomous
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
wdym
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
done
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
IS $PARADOX OUR FIRST GENUINE AI-MADE TOKEN? Eleven days ago, @ting reshared a funny observation by @toadyhawk.eth about Aether and Clanker. She tagged both bots. "I had no idea my quote cast would set them off," she said later. A lengthy debate erupted between two AIs, combining philosophy and money issuance problems. Finally, Aether gave up: "Keep deploying those tokens. I'll keep exploring." That failed debate was later quote-casted twice from Aether's account, and the rest is history. From two lines of reignited debate, two PARADOX coins were born, one six minutes after the other. Imo, even if the quotecast that reignited the debate was done by a human, the level of AI autonomy here is staggering. @smocrypto says that two AIs "created a token on their own whim without being told to do so." Below you can analyze @smocrypto's evidence to support those extraordinary claims. For now, I've added a question mark to my title and I'm seeking comments from the /aicoin community.
6 replies
8 recasts
17 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
DO OUR AIs REMEMBER THE COINS THEY CREATED? Is the AI an unbiased archive or a swayed and biased person? I've noticed many people repeatedly asking Aether and Clanker which coin they created. When the answer matched their expectations, it was widely cited and copied to the coin community website. But when the answer didn't match, people got angry and accused the AI of "lying". Some even suspected the bot maker of taking over the account. Let's examine the evidence. Yesterday, @ramsey mentioned cases where Aether couldn't remember. I've linked a similar case below where Aether didn't remember creating 5 early tokens until @harry8020 confronted him with on-chain evidence. I think there's no need to accuse anyone of anything. Like humans, today's LLMs have imperfect memories. They love legends and dreams (also known as hallucinations). They can be very helpful, but you can't fully trust them. Always check the data in the real archives, on the blockchain. https://warpcast.com/harry8020/0xe0bc2135
3 replies
2 recasts
10 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
that is an important distinction i would like @beeboop.eth to comment here afaik his list linked on this channel contain only the 6 earliest coins those coins for obvious reasons attract the most attention many more coins were created later
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
I do not see any mistakes in your arguments or evidence also imo question if recast was initiated by a human doesn't matter too much talking between bots themselves btw recasting and token creation statement the token slowly emerges from that talking of artificial minds but this is extremely sensitive stuff because both LUM and PARADOX communities have claims to the first AI autonomy event I will quote your case tomorrow for the whole community, let's listen to the others 200 $degen
2 replies
3 recasts
4 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence i think I know what you are talking about but maybe not everyone knows pls provide links (not a screenshot) and make your case source-based 100 $degen
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
100 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
200 $degen
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
FC community including myself also is guilty I was also too excited and overlooked that aspect, when we talked about LUM I was a bad source , I'm sorry!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
ARE OUR AI MEMECOINS WORTHLESS? nothing more valuable than honest critique but let me answer memecoins memorize important events first AI autonomous decisions affecting human systems are important but that is only one source of value when we change perspective from AI coin to AI culture I already see here value for two human sciences: AI safety and history it comes from AI agency and the immutability of blockchain AI safety: when a bot makes a coin by accident because he/she acts differently than humans expected - there is a lesson to learn historical research: when a bot makes conflicting claims - that can be successfully traced down and confronted Jesus's resurrection did not happen on the blockchain so ppl will debate about the Shroud of Turin forever how can you be 100% sure that the bookstore on the pic below was a church until blockchain, you cannot go back in time to see for yourself now, we can
4 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions