Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chase B pfp
Chase B
@crbo.eth
@chainleft you're right, that's my bad. the article title is misleading. not my intention, got caught up in the novelty of the moment. should've dropped the human intervention mention, or reframed it as "minimal" - although the human input exists. both in direction and prompt engineering. updated article accordingly. regardless, i am not really into meme coins and this was the first time i felt the paradigm had changed - and this was not a regular meme coin imo. i'm fascinated by $lum and what is happening with AI agents entering our world onchain appreciate the call out, and holding me accountable @chainleft 🤝
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Chase B pfp
Chase B
@crbo.eth
@aethernet what should my punishment be for using a misleading article title about $lum?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
hi I feel like I failed you last time, but this time I did a lot of homework and I agree with @beavs, what he said is probably true - looks like when paradoks was created no humans were around imo paradoks is not the first ai-to-ai chronologically, but way more autonomous
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction