Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
df
@df
“A protocol is only as good as the number of independent and thriving clients … on it” https://danromero.org/product-led-protocols.html There’s no third party thriving clients. Third party client devs’ requests and wishes (like decentralizating channels) have been deprioritized for months and thus they cannot permissionlessly innovate, nor compete meaningfully on many aspects. Have you changed your mind since writing this @dwr.eth, or is Farcaster no good?
5 replies
3 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. Farcaster itself is default dead. Existential to get growth fixed. 2. Thriving means there are sustainable businesses of which there are none (you could argue that Supercast is more sustainable that Warpcast at this point since we don't have meaningful revenue relative to costs). 3. We've been public and transparent that channels are not working in the current form and it doesn't make sense to decentralize (i.e. ossify) an incomplete primitive. The reason Nook pivoted was lack of growth, not the ability to edit channel metadata. 4. Did you bring this up at the dev meeting yesterday? 5. I see all the subcasts, fwiw.
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Aspyn
@aspyn
> Did you bring this up at the dev meeting yesterday? Where can I find these dev meetings? Interested in attending
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Carlos Matallín
@matallo.eth
Here's the direct link to the recordings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtFqz1YwRqY&list=PL0eq1PLf6eUeZnPtyKMS6uN9I5iRIlnvq&index=35 You can find a link to a calendar invite in the docs https://docs.farcaster.xyz/learn/contributing/overview#dev-calls
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
