teddit

random thoughts on onchain content:

1. for most people with taste (including artists, creators, etc), its actually demotivating and not compelling when they see bad content earn more money onchain than good content; obviously bad/good is subjective, but a turnoff nonetheless

2. most of the major onchain “curators” (i.e. people who can move markets to drive earnings for creators) are people with influence but not necessarily with taste; obviously not true for all onchain content models, but true for most “viral” pieces of onchain content and memes

whoever solves this wins

ashwinikumar

If you made a whole new platform for creators but your ethos to still work with elite artists that bring you revenue didn't change then did the pivot actually bring any value to the broader scope of onboarding artists or you're still clear on driving revenue based on popularity but still preach you're doing stuff for artists?

reminds me of a thought I shared a few days back

https://warpcast.com/ashwini/0x2284bfa6

(context is a platform running right now that's a pivot from another popular platform they had) the workings/curation/curators model didn't change (your #2)

#1 is always going to be open ended

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud”