Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex
@asenderling.eth
This tweet demonstrates the intellectual bankruptcy of the left. Once you're already at the worst possible description you lose a sense of nuance or daylight between Trump's policy and Harris'. The practical result is full ethnic cleansing and 1,000s of lives. https://x.com/NathanJRobinson/status/1886937360920666438
7 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
0xl0wlevelcr0w
@l0wlevelcr0w
I'm not seeing how the nuance between the policies is beneficial to the people of Gaza or the voters who want to end the suffering of gazans. Could you explain to me why I should compromise my vote to support genocide lite if I'm opposed to genocide in all it's forms?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Alex
@asenderling.eth
You're not 'voting to support genocide' in this case you'd be voting to prevent complete ethnic cleansing as that was clearly not on the table under Harris but is totally on the table for Trump. If you don't think there's a difference between 100k deaths and 1 million deaths idk what you tell you.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0xl0wlevelcr0w
@l0wlevelcr0w
I guess I'm not seeing how a million people are gonna die under one and not the other or why that wouldn't happen under a slow perpetual creep of land theft over trump's idiot blitzkrieg land theft.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Alex
@asenderling.eth
The numbers weren't meant literally, just a hypothetical demonstration that when posed with two options, one of which will reasonably result in less death (or genocide) it is better for the victims (or would-be victims) of the death/genocide that you choose that option. I think it's clear Harris was that choice.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
The amount of anti-war, single-issue voters was insignificant, regardless of how they voted. And there's damn sure not many who voted for trump. Not sure who you're trying to own here but it's nobody I've met.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
