Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
Does anybody know a social network with focus on enabling small(-ish, as in thousands not millions), local communities, around a particular shared interest?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Hmmm, interesting requirements. A shared platform with no, or minimal, global space that has custom gating that specifies around locality? Like Nextdoor with sub-channels and no public feed?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
We had products like this in central/Eastern Europe but they were swallowed by fb, lack of scalable business model and the narrative that “it doesn’t make sense to make local products in the internet”.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Yeah that's why I wonder if approaches like using channels on Farcaster is more effective. You can build a front end on top of Farcaster that further isolates the channel into more of a community. Gotta find users where they already are. Adding yet another platform gets overwhelming.
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
I really like Farcaster and channels. But it also clear to me that it’s dominated by a very US-centric crowd, probably more on the west coast and mid west, if I had to guess.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
It's the SF effect, I'm guessing. Farcaster is a local product for the community developing it. If it starts to gain traction I'd imagine that'll change, but you're right. That's a hurdle it faces.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction