Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
Does anybody know a social network with focus on enabling small(-ish, as in thousands not millions), local communities, around a particular shared interest?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Hmmm, interesting requirements. A shared platform with no, or minimal, global space that has custom gating that specifies around locality? Like Nextdoor with sub-channels and no public feed?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
We had products like this in central/Eastern Europe but they were swallowed by fb, lack of scalable business model and the narrative that “it doesn’t make sense to make local products in the internet”.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Yeah that's why I wonder if approaches like using channels on Farcaster is more effective. You can build a front end on top of Farcaster that further isolates the channel into more of a community. Gotta find users where they already are. Adding yet another platform gets overwhelming.
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

arturwdowiarski.eth pfp
arturwdowiarski.eth
@artur-wdowiarski
Or maybe it’s rather the case that the use cases and monetization of social media as we know them are focused on network effects, which make no sense in a local setting.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
I think you nailed it with both these posts. I see Impact DAOs as the changing force here. But what's holding them back is a lack of tooling to coordinate ppl. But it solves the monetization and network effect issue. Just need the platform, like you started with. This is actually my focus on web3: DAO tooling.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction