Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
justin.framedl.eth pfp
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
just bought 6 additional units of storage via caststorage.com (cheers, @sammdec.eth), let's see if that keeps me good on the replies 😆 so does this mean, what's pruned is never pruned? or, is what's pruned already gone for good?
3 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Curious, why buy so many at one time? Do you think you’ll use all that in next ~11 months? Think price of ETH will crash?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
justin.framedl.eth pfp
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
my reaction count now is already >10k since (50% of my current capacity) while pretty sure i can live w/o >99% of the casts i've made, i want to make sure i hold onto everything for now while deliberating whether to maintain my own hub 😅
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@artlu
also, good chance the price will rise: rn there's only two (and 1/2) spam defense plans: 1/ curated invites 2/ active caster formula 2.5/ moderator experiment Discove sunsetted; no newer alt client has experimented w/ filtering; WC is waiting for EAS to mature (no inside info, just my outsider's interpretation)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
What are your thoughts on using Storage Units (SU) price as a spam reduction tactic? Not grok’n the wait for EAS. Would you speculate more for us on that topic? Isn’t FC one big message attestation syncing protocol? 🙏
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@artlu
(1/2) SU price seems tough: - icky: OG vs n00b for 1yr - too low->airdrop hunters - too high->VC/angel signallooors not clear there's sweet spot in the middle. caster quality seems orthogonal to willingness-to-pay. DAU growth is more about freshness retroactive grants via Purple? nah, who wants to play gatekeeper
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@artlu
(2/2) I use "EAS" as short-hand for decentralized identity+onchain data to curate one's feed. Like saying, "I want to see casts from developers with >5 GH commits in past month, in a privacy-preserving way without having to browse someone's GH activity" or, only those with ENS, EOAs > 1yr old, balances > $200, etc
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
So extensible profile attributes/data at Mon anchored onchain. A stated preferences profile that is privacy preserved. Think I Gotcha.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@artlu
+ integrated into clients for user-customizable feed filters/curation until such tools appear, 90% of current effort to grow quality DAU appears to be with channel mods. 10% with Purple Welcome Committee. The only remaining levers I see are 1/ group invites, 2/ delegated personal invites, and 3/ SU price numba go up
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
One could argue a reason for that 90% channel focus is app devs have been treated like second class citizens. Are they being counted in DAUs? Network DAUs > 🚾 DAUs (obvi sorry) Yes, App group invites. 🙌
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@artlu
say more about 2nd class citizen treatment? I disagree but am open to ur pov: - protocol is permissionless+nearly free - Neynar provides api/infra diversity - FC team gave great visibility to Discove, FarQuest, Herocast, Opencast, CastStorage, Farcord, TilesCool, +more - hasn't stepped on or co-opted innovation AFAICT
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
We probably agree more than we don’t. Visibility sure yet protocol changes have been wired to wc. Let’s look back at @betashop.eth’s feed, dev call comments and actions divesting Jam. Incredibly frustrating for anybody making investments in FC apps. MerkelM has a massive call option on app features ->app pivots
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
much here is counterfactual sooo Looking forward is more productive✌️ Decentralize protocol now and that will drive further investments into the network. Finding it hard to believe success for FC at this point is dependent on the creativity of one app dictating protocol capabilities. Lots of small bets…
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@artlu
let me call out 1 large point of contention (and personally, one I can live with): - artist/creator communities would love more multimedia esp. video - WC leaves that space for others to address - without protocol-level first-class video, too much technical risk+eng lift to also hook in sthg else (e.g., LivePeer)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
TOTALLY agree. The video won’t move DAUs belief surprises me. It is THE money maker for creators (pods 2nd). Creators bring and grow audience. Support raises issues for sure. Not much direction thus far & history likely has devs cautious about leading way. I’m gonna stop now & watch people like that last fact.😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction