Sassquatch 🦧

Contest discussion: should this cast qualify for rewards?

- no actual SassyHash 💅, but it has Sassy-related content
- 4 mods liked
- 200+ likes
- 1 unique view with the cast action (this week, so far)

I am leaning towards

2471537326111cd4764bc68a75383798d038a778960e119db19b903e89f01891

WDYT?

(mute the phrase '!sassy1' to stop seeing SassyHash 💅 in your feed)

🐟 Snappa | picosub.artlu.xyz | SassyHash.artlu.xyz

Find me with my same PFP on GH

Farcaster OG | FID: 10174 | @fireflyapp Ambassador | /bnfarcaster 🎙 in Spanish  | https://web3.bio/cryptowenmoon.eth

Why was there a view with the cast action if there’s no actual hash? 😂

1f5f30108f004a99c41d122f801a6ed298be006cd5aca240bd5734e5f95753ba

An Influencer /content-creators 🔹Freelancer🔹Amateur Photographer🔹Crypto Enthusiast 🔹Owner /xbteam /speakup /ai-canvas 🔹🔹🔹 link3.to/xbornid 🔹🔹🔹

more likes from mods don't help with the ranking, it is just a necessary condition to qualify to receive rewards.

the views are more important IMO. Especially where someone has to click twice to see the content, that's a barrier that costs no money but is still pretty darn high for most people

Can they get 4 likes from mods? 
It looks like it's going to look pretty difficult for them.

So far I have rarely been able to get 200 likes 😅
But maybe we can get hundreds of views with quality content.

ex-/airswap. part time node runner, full time shitcaster, all time higher

grey area. the code counts unique cast action actions on the cast.

I *try* to stay impartial to content that I can decode, and content that I can't decode

(for example, a user using the permissionless protocol layer of SassyHash with their own secrets, I can never distinguish from gibberish)

I thought the contest requires a sassyhash?