Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘πŸ”„ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘πŸ”„
@logonaut.eth
A β€œlike” that has no value produces a signal that has no meaning. What if each β€œlike” assigned cost you 0.1 warps? Or cost some fractional ownership of an NFT you own? Would a tiny bit of friction be so bad if produced a better signal?
6 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

artlu 🎩 pfp
artlu 🎩
@artlu
yes, because the same amount of money means different things to different people
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘πŸ”„ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘πŸ”„
@logonaut.eth
Hmm, I guess on that basis, UBI would never work, either. I suppose a truly meaningless signal has the advantage of being equally meaningless to everyone.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

artlu 🎩 pfp
artlu 🎩
@artlu
I'm not sure I follow the logic on UBI, wdym?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘πŸ”„ pfp
logonaut.eth πŸŽ©πŸ–β†‘πŸ”„
@logonaut.eth
I just mean that if minimally monetized likes are too precious for some to spend, might not someone similarly argue against UBI because the amount of it means different things to different people?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction