Meg
@meganmichelle.eth
The most successful part of farcaster has been channels. Then they got dropped. Why? No good answer.
5 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
artlu 🎩
@artlu
my observations only: - messy UX with so many being created, even at $25 to rent them - none of the moderation experiments ever felt sustainable esp big channels that invite spam - niche channels don't grow significantly by definition - no clear business oppty's around what had looked initially promising
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Meg
@meganmichelle.eth
Good observations 💡
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
JR ↑
@juli
You‘re right: prev approach with 100s of channels is bad - fragmenting the few users. But it’s literally so close to being a high-value-add for farcaster and I can’t believe they didn’t invest in modding a select few high quality channels (which get too big/spammed, lose value) - that would be the main go-to-channels here & be attractive for 24/7 Users as well as weekly lurkers. Additionally Niche (3rd Party) Channels can grow Daily retention or become a Main factor to Login as we‘ve seen with token Communities like /degen or /higher. Fwiw I have been logging in here for channels, never for the Mail Feed & random notifications. Miniapps are a factor too now. https://warpcast.com/juli/0x0c58af06
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions