Chris Dixon
@cdixon.eth
Today’s announcement that Farcaster is now a fully permissionless protocol is a step towards a future of decentralized social networks that I believe will be better for users and other network participants. Here’s why.
19 replies
110 recasts
426 reactions
Chris Dixon
@cdixon.eth
The rise of modern social networking turbocharged the internet by lowering the barriers for users to become publishers & build an audience. But in today’s dominant social networking model, control & economic rewards flow mostly to the companies at the network center, not users, creators, & developers at the edges.
1 reply
0 recast
26 reactions
Chris Dixon
@cdixon.eth
Blockchains invert this power dynamic. Without a company at the center calling the shots, the control and economic rewards flow primarily to users, creators, and developers at the edges, similar to how they do in the internet’s original protocol networks, email and the web.
2 replies
1 recast
21 reactions
Chris Dixon
@cdixon.eth
This can generate a virtuous cycle: creators and developers know they’ll be rewarded and the rules won’t change on them, so they invest in building tools and creating content that improves the experience and attracts more participants.
1 reply
0 recast
20 reactions
Chris Dixon
@cdixon.eth
The time is right for decentralized social networks. Thanks to innovations like roll ups, blockchains are now able to power permissionless social networks with features and experiences that rival modern incumbent social networks.
2 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
Arjun Ram
@arjunram
Reminded of StatusNet from 2010. Combined with Twitter’s proxy setting you could run your own social network. In fact we used to suck in all of a publishers content use ML to classify content and publish to accounts. Would be interesting to build that over this protocol.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
