Apex777
@apex777.eth
BABYDEGEN is not good for the DEGEN brand. Weird move.
9 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
Apex777
@apex777.eth
And yes I'm fudding my own bags here, but I'd rather be honest.
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Deployer
@deployer
I missed it. What is it?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Siman
@siman
The warning triangle says it all β οΈ
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
eggman π΅
@eggman.eth
pending it's not actually a scam (and I've no idea on if it is/isnt), usually baby{x} coins are reflective tokens which purchase and distribute the main {x} token to holders of the baby token. It can cause significant buy pressure & volume on the {x} token, but the baby token.. well, once the flywheel slows, bags can get very rekt. Not trying to fud something I've not even looked at (might not even be that type of token), but yeah, in general, maybe PTSD from the last market cycle but I personally steer clear of any reflection-style tokenomics. ..but yeah, the fact he doesn't have an SSL cert sorted is a wee bit of a red flag imho π
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
If itβs by a rando, how does it affect the degen brand?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Drake π©
@taliskye
Yeah that whole thing is a big big miss
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ceej
@ceej
ugh apex now im gonna ape and h8 myself
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Omishon πα½ π©
@omishon
100% agree. Any crypto og knows reflection coins usually just go south and it's like a weird incentive, "buy my coin so u can get more of this other coin u like more"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Optic
@beatsbyoptic
/microsub tip: πx133
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephen Miller πββ¨-β¨
@stephenmiller
/microsub tip: πx241
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction