Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

antimo 🎩 pfp
antimo 🎩
@antimofm.eth
Thinking aloud on this I read somewhere that content can either be informative, educational or entertaining. In the context of socialfi, we could probably add "remunerative". The trick here, however, is that: - we can't (and probably wouldn't want to) gate reading, but only casting - only root-level casts are curated: everyone can reply * So the answer is that we're making it up together as we go. I have something to share about that, will do that later today ps @df @jtgi is that true? how did that channel experiment go?
4 replies
6 recasts
109 reactions

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
Are you referring to df’s no reply channel? What’s the question? πŸ˜…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

antimo 🎩 pfp
antimo 🎩
@antimofm.eth
Yes, I tried it back then and I don't remember if it ended up working or not πŸ€” wouldn't do that on /design, just curious
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
I thought it was cool. The experiment got cut short though because when channel decentralization went into phase 1 the ability to moderate replies was removed.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction